After a month with the Motorola Edge 60, I think it’s as good as the most expensive phones I’ve tested

The best cheap phone I’ve tested in years

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.

Verdict

The Motorola Edge 60 could pass as a phone twice its price: with a premium design, loads of storage space and RAM, good-looking display and fast charging, it’s just as good at day-to-day tasks as a top-end mobile, and its other specs are still impressive given how cheap the device is. It’s one of the best phones on the market right now, and certainly the best I’ve reviewed in a long time.

Pros

  • +Serious bang for your buck
  • +Premium looks
  • +Adaptable camera array

Cons

  • -Limited color options
  • -Bloatware
  • -A few camera bugs

Motorola Edge 60 two-minute review

I’ve tested loads of great low-cost phones over many years, but it’s rare for me to think “I’d actually buy this if I was on the market” given how I am used to premium mobiles. However, the Motorola Edge 60 earns this distinction thanks to its high-quality build at a shockingly low price.

The Moto Edge 60 is the latest member of Moto’s ‘top-end’ (i.e. not as cheap as its other options) range of Android phones and was released alongside a bigger sibling, theEdge 60 Pro,which I tested first thinking it would be the more interesting phone. How wrong I was.

At a glance, you’d think that the Edge 60 would be a contender for our list of thebest cheap phones: relatively affordable, low specs, overshadowed by a more impressive device and finding one area in which to punch above its weight (in this case, and again just at a glance, the design department).

However this Moto is a wolf in… well, wolf’s clothing, and it offers enough value for money that I think it should be in contention for our overall list of thebest phonesyou can buy.

The phone’s design is a work of art. Moto’s Edge phones have long been some of the most attractive due to the collaboration with Pantone to offer them in funky and interesting colors, but it rounds out the package with a lovely-to-hold textured back, gentle curved-edge display, lightweight body and seriously study protections.

The screen is just as appealing, offering the same specs that you’d get in a phone twice the price, and holding up surprisingly well in the sun thanks to a high max brightness. There’s also a nice big battery, fast charging and way, way more storage than I’d expect to see in a phone at this price.

I need to mention price here, but every time I want to reference it I end up double checking “wait, is the phonereallythat cheap?” The price is lower than I can wrap my head around given the design and specs at play.

Some usual sore spots amongst Moto phones are offset here by the low price of the thing. The processor isn’t particularly speedy but I never found an issue with day-to-day tasks or even light gaming. The cameras would be fine for a mid-range phone but are surprisingly good at this price point; how many budget phones have zoom lenses these days?!

If there were any issues, it was in the software. Load up the phone and it’s chock-full of bloatware, a problem that can be solved by quickly deleting all the pre-installed apps and adding your own. And I found a few issues in the camera app that might compel you to take a little extra time when snapping pictures, but neither of these issues are deal-breakers by any means.

For the last few years, the cheap phones I’ve reviewed have mostly been blocky, low-cost devices that have ignored design or style in favor of hardcore specs. Motorola shows us that you can have an attractive phone that still works well, with specs that keep the phone running smoothly, all while keeping the price low. If I needed to buy a phone right now, to the Motorola Edge 60 I would go.

Motorola Edge 60 review: price and availability

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.
  • Released in April 2025
  • Costs £379 (roughly $520, AU$700)
  • No US release expected; AU possibly

The Motorola Edge 60 was released alongside its Pro model in April 2025, and was followed not long after by the Fusion.

You can pick up the phone in its sole configuration (12GB RAM, 512GB storage, blue model) for £379 (roughly $520, AU$700). A US release is unlikely due to differences in Moto’s release patterns there; it’s more likely in Australia as the Fusion sibling released there but we don’t know for sure if it’ll release.

For contrast the Pro model costs £599 (roughly $800, AU$1,250) while the Fusion sells for £299 / AU$699 (roughly $400); here’s where I’d compare it to the previous-gen version if I had one, but Moto skipped the non-appendix member of the family in 2024. However last year’s Edge 50 Fusion went for £349.99 / AU$599 (roughly $475) so it’s the best point of comparison.

With a price tag like the one it has, the Moto Edge 60 straddles the budget and mid-range phone markets, tempting to people who are on a budget but don’t want to settle for any old phone.

Motorola Edge 60 review: specs

Dimensions:161.2 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm
Weight:179g
Screen:6.67-inch FHD (1220 x 2712) 120Hz P-OLED
Chipset:Mediatek Dimensity 7300
RAM:12GB
Storage:512GB
OS:Android 15
Primary camera:50MP, f/1.8
Ultra-wide camera:50MP f/2.0 122-degree
Telephoto camera:10MP, f/2.0 3x optical
Front camera:50MP, f/2.0
Audio:Dolby Atmos stereo speakers
Battery:5,200mAh
Charging:68W wired
Colors:Gibraltar Sea

Motorola Edge 60 review: design

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.
  • Only premium-looking phone at this price
  • Lightweight with textured rear
  • Comes in one color: blue

Design-wise, the Edge 60 isn’t that different from its contemporaries or predecessors, but I dubbed the Pro the “best-looking phone of the year” and this model is the same — the only real change Moto made is a good one.

Motorola’s long-standing partnership with paint company Pantone continues with the Edge 60, but only to a limited degree: there’s only one single color option. This is called Gibraltar Sea and it’s a royal blue that’s dignified, though I can’t help but feel longing for the selection of vibrant colors other Edge mobiles have come in. Apparently in some countries a green version called Shamrock is available, but in the UK it’s just blue.

Like other members of the cohort, and most past generations of Edge, the 60 has a curved-edge display a premium though divisive feature which makes handsets feel a lot more comfortable to hold… though sometimes prone to accidental touches (something I never encountered).

On the back, the camera bump doesn’t poke out too far, and is incorporated into the rear of the device as you can see in images. The back is smooth and textured — apparently it’s made of silicone but it feels just like leather to me.

The edges offer a volume rocker and power button on the right edge, and a USB-C port — sadly no 3.5mm jack, though the phone is so thin that I don’t even know if one would fit. To be precise it measures 161.2 x 73.1 x 7.9mm and weighs 179g.

Another premium feature on offer is the protection: the phone has IP69 protection against immersion in water and fine objects, and also the military-standard MIL-STF-810H rating which means it’s safe in certain rugged conditions.

The bespoke AI key of the Edge 60 Pro is absent here, an omission I’ll detract exactly no points for as it wasn’t very useful and I’m happy to see it go.

  • Design score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 review: display

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.
  • 6.67 inches, 2712 x 1220 resolution
  • 120Hz refresh rate, 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Easy to see in sunlight

Motorola has put a 6.67-inch pOLED screen in the Edge 60, a size which must be the most popular across the entire Android market… though bear in mind the curved edges of the mobile mean it’s not all viewing space.

The resolution is 1220 x 2712 which matches the Pro and it’s stretched on a 20:9 aspect ratio. The refresh rate is 120Hz and the phone supports HDR10+; most of these are standard for Androids, especially at this price.

The max brightness of 4500 nits is great though, ensuring that you can see the screen in the sun (or blind yourself when you turn on the device at night).

It’s hard to fault the Edge 60’s screen, given that you can pay more than double the amount to get the same specs. It’s good-looking with vibrant colors and a few customization options too.

  • Display score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 review: software

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.
  • Android 15 with three guaranteed updates
  • Moto AI app isn’t very useful
  • Packed with bloatware

Motorola remains one of the few Android phone makers to use stock (or near-stock) Android, even though myriad tweaks ensure that the software on its phones feel distinct to on Google phones.

The Edge 60 comes with Android 15, the latest iteration of the software for 2025, and Moto has pledged at least three years of software updates. Given the arms race that is ‘phone companies announcing long shelf lives for their phones’, three years falls short of a fair few rivals (and even the Edge 60 Pro), but this will only be an issue for people who want their phone to have every new feature as it comes – the mobile will likely get security updates for much longer.

Despite not having an AI key like the Pro, the Edge 60 still comes with a Moto AI app which is a smart assistant and image generator rolled into one. However Google Assistant is much quicker for triggering tasks around your phone and image generators aren’t exactly things most people use every day, so I didn’t do much with Moto AI beyond checking it out for this review.

One thing you can do with it is create a wallpaper for your phone. Customization has always been strong on Motorola phones and that’s no different here: you can change font, color scheme, icon shapes, the animation that appears when you unlock the phone with your fingerprint, the light that appears on the screen curves when you get a notification, and so on.

As a final gripe: Android has always been popular as it’s a clean, simple user interface, but Motorola has included bloatware in the Edge 60 Pro. No, I’m not talking about the ever-growing list of Google apps that all Android phones come with, or even Moto’s own suite of apps (the function of many of which remains unclear).

But when I booted up my phone it already had apps like TikTok,AmazonMusic, LinkedIn, Opera and whatever Perplexity is. I’ve never used any of these apps and don’t plan to start just because they’re cluttering up my phone screen.

  • Software score: 3.5 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 review: cameras

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.
  • 50MP main, 50MP ultra-wide and 10MP telephoto cameras
  • 50MP front-facing
  • Pictures look dull and colorless
  • Offers the standard range of camera modes

Having tested countless Motorola phones over the years, I’m used to the camera array being their Achilles’ Heel; I gave the Pro model only three stars out of five in this department. However the Moto Edge 60 has the exact same camera set-up for a much lower price, making it a pretty great-value budget camera phone.

There are three rear cameras on the Edge 60: a 50MP main, 50MP ultra-wide and 10MP telephoto for 3x zoom and yes, before you ask, that’s surprisingly solid hardware for a phone at this price. I don’t remember the last time I saw a budget phone with a zoom lens.

Photos taken on the main camera look decent, as they’re clear and bright, although not especially vibrant in terms of color and I did see a few white areas get blown out in multiple photos I took.

The ultra-wide camera has a few issues – pictures could be quite distorted around the edges, and the color profile of snaps taken on it were quite different to ones taken on the other cameras (look at how the sky changes in samples below).

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.

But getting to enjoy a zoom camera helped me calm these woes. The 3x zoom lets you get closer to details or create a nice depth of field for close-up shots, and you can even zoom digitally up to 30x but these images were really blobby and unclear.

A few other snafus affected my results with the camera: at one point Portrait Mode decided to keep my background perfectly clear but add ‘bokeh’ solely to me, in the foreground, and sometimes AI modes like Night Mode would change quite substantially between capturing a picture and it being processed in the gallery, in at least one case creating a much worse image.

In terms of a feature set, Motorola includes all the standard ones (like Portrait and Night, which I’ve mentioned before, and slow-mo video, panorama, time lapse, you know the ilk). But there aren’t any unique additions that change the game.

The selfie camera clocks in at 50MP and it performs pretty identically to its rear counterpart: it’s bright and clear but colors could be more exciting. Portrait Mode was, at least on this camera, pretty accurate in what it blurred.

  • Camera score: 3.5 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 camera samples

A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60.A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60A camera sample taken on the Motorola Edge 60.

Motorola Edge 60 review: performance and audio

The Motorola Edge 60 on the arm of a chair.
  • Mid-range Dimensity 7300 chipset
  • 12GB RAM and 512GB Storage
  • Dolby Atmos-tuned stereo speakers

A clear sign of a cheap phone is its processor but the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 used in the Edge 60 handled everything well (a surprise since we found it struggled in theCMF Phone Pro 2). Moto has already used this chipset in theEdge 50 Neobut that had less RAM.

Using the Geekbench 6 benchmarking test, the Moto returned an average multi-core score of 2988, which is roughly the same as theEdge 50 Pro– you’re not getting blazing-fast speeds but for most everyday tasks it’s totally fine.

That shows in day-to-day use: I rarely found performance issues during testing except during gaming, which occasionally could be stuttery or laggy but for the most part was fine too. Just don’t expect to play top-end mobile games and get out unscathed.

As mentioned before, the Edge 60 only comes in one configuration, and it’s a surprising one for a low-cost phone. You get 12GB RAM, which undoubtedly helps with the performance speeds of the phone, and 512GB which is practically unheard of at this cost. That’s absolutely loads of extra space for photos, apps or downloaded games.

Moto doesn’t put 3.5mm headphone jacks in its Edge phones any more so you can only enjoy wired audio with an adaptor from its USB-C port. Your other ways of listening to audio are via Bluetooth or the stereo speakers which are, despite being Dolby Atmos tuned, just phone speakers – not exactly an audiophile’s paradise.

  • Performance score: 3.5 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 Pro review: battery life

The Motorola Edge 60 on the arm of a chair.

  • Large 5,200mAh battery
  • 68W wired charging
  • No wireless or reverse charging

Motorola has packed the Edge 60 Pro with a massive 6,000mAh battery, which is markedly bigger than the cell in its predecessor, though thThe Moto Edge 50 comes with a 5,200mAh battery, which marks a small size increase from the last-gen Edge members, but overall is pretty standard for a phone of its size in 2025.

In my testing the battery easily lasted a full day of use, but I wouldn’t rely on it to make it through a second day of use without charging; if you do much gaming or video streaming you might only get one day of use out of it per charge, although that’d involve a fair amount of screen time.

Through normal use I generally saw the phone drop to between 20% and 50% by the time I went to bed, which rules out a second day of use but shows there’s wiggle room for me to use it more.

The Edge 60 supports 68W wired charging, which is a nice bristling speed that’ll see the battery charged in well under an hour – from empty, it takes just over 45 minutes to get to full if you’re not using the phone.

  • Battery score: 4 / 5

Motorola Edge 60 review: value

The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.

If you skipped straight to this section: I’ve spent the past six sections waxing lyrical about how every aspect of the Motorola Edge 60 punches above its weight.

By ‘weight,’ of course, I mean price. You’re getting a phone that’s better-looking than its same-price rivals as well as one that’s equipped by a better camera array, offering more storage, packing a more attractive display and lasting longer.

The value proposition here is seriously impressive, and I give the full five stars because I don’t see any companies doing better. Obviously if you find this thing at a discount, it would be aneven bettervalue, but don’t wait for a sale to pick it up.

  • Value score: 5 / 5
The Motorola Edge 60 in front of a flowery bush.

Buy it if…

You want a fashion centerpiece
While it’s a bit weird to make your phone a fashion statement, the Pantone-infused Moto DNA lets you do that thanks to its vibrant hue and curvy, fun look.

You need lots of storage
I’m still surprised that Motorola put 512GB storage in a phone at this price. Forget expandable memory or cloud storage, that’s more spare than I’d use in half a decade.

You want a cheap camera phone
Another surprising aspect of the Moto Edge 60 is the presence of a zoom lens, something that barely any low-cost phones have these days (and few mid-range ones either). This gives you loads of extra versatility for photography, at a market segment that rarely has any.

Don’t buy it if…

You’re on a super-light budget
While the Edge 60 is certainly not expensive, it’s still not the cheapest phone on the market. If you want something even more affordable, Moto has its G series which are also great value for money.

You’re a big gamer
The Edge 60 has decent enough processing power but there are other handsets for cheaper that offer more speed, as well as unique gaming features.

You don’t like curved-edge displays
There’s no accounting for taste and not everyone likes phones with curved-edge screens. If you fall into this regrettable camp, then there are enough other options for you beyond the Moto.

Which is better for astrophotography? Sony, Canon or Nikon?

Three giants in the camera industry — but which one has the best astrophotography features for you?

The milky way galaxy as seen over a mountain range.

The Milky Way is a popular target for astrophotographers. (Image credit: Getty Images)

It can be a complex decision to choose the right camera brand for astrophotography. With new technology and an ever-increasing rate of camera development, the major photographic brands that we see regularly popping up, like Canon,Nikon, andSony, each bring district strengths to the table. Telling these strengths apart and knowing what to pay attention to can sometimes be difficult. In astrophotography, key factors likelow-light performance, high ISO capabilities, noise reduction, and any included specific astro-centric features are paramount. If you are in the market for a camera, it might be worth checking out these brands in ourcamera deals hub. In this article, we will discuss how the brands compare and answer common tech queries about each system.

Sony

Sony excels at handling high ISO with minimal noise. (Image credit: Getty Images)

Firstly, Sony recently broke ground with its cutting-edge sensor technology. Sony’s mirrorless systems, especially the full-frame options, excel in handling high ISO settings with minimal noise, making them popular for astrophotographers and people taking images in low-light environments. Their backside illuminated sensors (often referred to as BI sensors) allow more light to hit the pixel area, improving sensitivity and reducing noise, which is crucial for capturing faint celestial objects. Sony also has excellent real-time star tracking and pixel shift technology to provide clear, high-detail astro images, but much of this comes at a price, with good full-frame Sony options coming in at thousands of dollars.

Canon

Canon’s exceptional color science makes them a favorite among astrophotographers.(Image credit: Getty Images)

Canon has long been a favorite for astrophotography thanks to its exceptional color science and sensor performance at higher ISO values, although they tend to produce slightly more noise than Sony’s comparable models. Canon’s strength lies in its wide range ofcompatible lensesand dedicated low-light features in select models such as theCanon EOS R5andEOS R6. The affordability of many of their models mean that second-hand Canon options can often be purchased for a fraction of the price of many newer options.

>>>LP-E5 Battery for Canon EOS 450D 500D 1000D KISSX2 KISSX3

Nikon

Nikon has recently stepped up its game with mirrorless Z-series cameras, like theNikon Z6andZ7. Nikon’s full-frame cameras boast excellent dynamic range and superb low-light performance, making them competitive for astrophotography. Like Sony, Nikon’s backside illumination sensor technology helps with reducing noise at high ISOs, though Nikon’s high ISO noise reduction isn’t always as aggressive as Sony’s. Nikon also offers specialized features such as ‘star-eater’ suppression, designed to maintain image quality during long exposures which will come in handy for photographers who are pointing towards the night sky.

‘Star eater’ suppression is designed to maintain image quality during long exposures.(Image credit: Getty Images)

>>>EN-EL18D Battery for Nikon Z9 D4 D4S D5 D6

Best entry-level cameras for astrophotography

If you are just getting started in astrophotography, you will want to look at setups that allow experimentation — a mixture of affordability and awide range of lensesis important to look at. TheNikon D5600is a good starting point — plenty of lens combinations are available and the 24.2 MP sensor has an ISO range of 100-25,600. It is also good at low light autofocus, which, although, as a budding astrophotographer, you’ll rarely use, it is good to have as an option if you are taking photos of a supermoon, for example.

Low light autofocus is a good feature to have when photographing a supermoon.(Image credit: jamesvancouver via Getty Images)

We would also recommend something like the ultra-portableSony Alpha a6400, which, although still an APS-C sensor, offers options for interchangeable lenses and features real-time tracking, where it uses AI behavior models to detect and capture objects in the distance automatically.

CameraSensorISO RangeMegapixelPriceAstro-features
Sony Alpha a6400APS-C100-32,00024.2$900Real-time tracking
Canon EOS Rebel T7i (800D)APS-C100-25,60024.2$750Dual Pixel AF
Nikon D5600APS-C100-25,60024.2$700Low-light AF

Best mid-range cameras for astrophotography

Long exposure shooting is unavoidable in astrophotography (Image credit: Getty Images)

If you have learned the ropes and you are looking to take a step up from entry-level gear, mid-range cameras offer enhanced performance, better noise control, and several more advanced features that you are likely to use in other forms of photography, too. They are also more likely to feature full-frame sensors, which means that you will produce larger images and more detail to work with in the edit.

TheSony Alpha A7 IIIis an excellent choice for serious astrophotographers on a mid-range budget. Its full-frame sensor performs excellently in low-light scenarios, minimizing noise and maximizing detail in dark environments. TheNikon’s Z6is also an option to consider – it strikes a good balance between price and performance and like the A7 III, it uses a backside illumination sensor to allow more light to reach inside the camera, making it great for night sky photography. It also features in-body stabilization and excellent star tracking to help with long-exposure shots.

CameraSensorISO RangeMegapixelPriceAstro features
Sony Alpha A7 IIIFull-frame100-51,20024.2$2000Excellent ISO handling
Canon EOS RFull-frame100-40,00030.3$1800RF lens mount offers lots of choice
Nikon Z6Full-frame100-51,20024.5$1600Star tracking

Should you switch camera brands?

Once you have committed to a camera brand, and bought the associated lenses and accessories, it is sometimes quite hard to go back to the drawing board. However, if other brands or cameras have specific attributes that will help you in astrophotography, it is well worth having a look at the implications of switching. We will take each switch option and weigh it up.

Switching to Canon

If you are moving from Sony to Canon, expect to see a difference in image color science, with Canon often praised for its color accuracy. Switching to Canon can be a money saver, thanks to the high availability of lenses and bodies.

Switching away from either Sony or Nikon towards Canon may only be necessary for those looking for a switch to a camera for life full of professional specs like theCanon EOS R5.

One thing that is worth reiterating is that Canon’s widespread popularity means lens options (new and used) are plentiful — so worth considering for those who want to save money.

Switching to Sony

Sony’s high ISO noise reduction is impressive for capturing stars and deep sky objects.(Image credit: Kimberley Lane)

Although it will hit your wallet a little harder, switching to Sony offers better high ISO noise reduction and sensor technology, making it ideal for those focused on capturing deep-space objects. Switching would require an investment in Sony’s full-frame mirrorless lens system, but the superior noise handling at high ISOs can be a game-changer — these are some of the best cameras you can buy at each price point.

Switching to Nikon

Nikon offers a comparable dynamic range to its competitors and solid low-light performance in its mirrorless Z-series, but the shift away from Sony or Canon may not bring a significant leap in performance unless you value Nikon’s lens ecosystem or prefer Nikon’s ergonomics and handling.

Some photographers prefer Nikon’s ergonomics and handling.

Nikon’s dynamic range however is often praised, and this can benefit landscape astrophotographers who want more flexibility in post-processing. Their growing range of Z-mount lenses can make the switch worth it, especially for those prioritizing dynamic range over specialized astro features.

Summary

Deciding on whether to switch depends on your astrophotography goals.(Image credit: Getty Images)

The decision to switch between Sony, Canon, and Nikon largely depends on your specific astrophotography goals. Each brand offers its own set of strengths, whether it’s Sony’s superior ISO handling, Canon’s specialized low-light features, or Nikon’s dynamic range. Cost, lens availability, and compatibility with your existing astrophotography setup (includingtelescopes) should also factor into the decision. It is worth looking at theused marketto ensure you are getting the best setup for your dollar. It will also come down to the ergonomics and usability of each camera; which menu system and which interfaces you feel most comfortable with.

Nikon shutter type options explained – which do you choose when?

Z-series cameras have a variety of shutter options. Here’s how they work…

When taking action shots of fast-moving subjects with a camera that has a conventional image sensor, the mechanical shutter avoids the ‘rolling shutter’ effect

A conventional camera shutter works in an entirely mechanical way. The shutter is fully closed before taking a shot. At the start of an exposure, the ‘first curtain’ opens, traversing the image sensor in the process. At the end of the exposure, the second curtain slides across in front of the sensor.

But at very fast shutter speeds, the second curtain starts to close before the first curtain has fully opened. That can cause a dark band in images when using a flashgun. The solution is to use ‘Auto FP’ (Auto Focal Plane) orHigh-Speed Sync’flash, which fires a short burst of flashes rather than a single flash. 

NikonZ-system mirrorless cameras with mechanical shutters offer other options with pros and cons, but curing the flash sync problem isn’t one of them.

Going electric

Almost all Z-system cameras default to an ‘Auto’ shutter mode. This uses a conventional mechanical shutter most of the time, automatically switching to an ‘electronic first curtain shutter’ when it would be beneficial. As its name suggests, this uses electronics to initiate the exposure, but a mechanical second curtain to end the exposure. As well as letting the camera choose which type of shutter to use, you can select either option for yourself in the Custom Setting menu. In the Photo Shooting menu, you’ll also find a ‘Silent photography’ option. This enables a fully electronic shutter, making the mechanical shutter redundant.

TheNikon Z8andZ9are exceptions in that they ditch the mechanical shutter for stills exposures. Thanks to the super-fast data readout of their fully stacked image sensors, these cameras rely purely on an electronic shutter. 

TheZ6 IIIhas a partially stacked image sensor, which is much faster than conventional sensors but not quite as fast as in the Z8 and Z9. The Z6 III therefore has a mechanical shutter and offers the same range of options as most other Z-system cameras.

>>>EN-EL18D Battery for Nikon Z9 D4 D4S D5 D6

Shutter type

To select shutter types, head to the Custom Setting menu of Z-system cameras. You’ll need to go to the Shooting/display section and select the option showing as ‘d4 Shutter type’ in the Zfc camera that we’re using here by way of example. And lest we forget, some Nikon DSLRs also have an electronic first curtain shutter option, including theD7500,D500,D810andD850.

>>>EN-EL25 Battery for Nikon Z50 ZFC

Auto shutter mode

Cameras with a mechanical shutter default to it automatically. As detailed in this image, the camera automatically selects the most appropriate shutter mode for the shooting conditions, usually sticking to the mechanical option but swapping to electronic first curtain shutter when this would be beneficial. Leave the camera in Auto mode unless you have particular needs.

Mechanical shutter

As defaulted to in Auto mode, the Mechanical shutter option usually works best. The mechanical shutter takes a snapshot of the scene, which is read out from the image sensor to the image processor. The full range of shutter speeds is available whereas, in Electronic first curtain mode, the maximum shutter speed is often limited to 1/2000 sec. However, the latter mode can be beneficial.

Electronic front-curtain shutter

At shutter speeds of around 1/60 sec or slower, mechanical movement, often referred to as ‘shutter shock’, can degrade sharpness as it can destabilize the camera. The effect can also be problematic when shooting with long telephoto lenses and inmacrophotography. Shutter shock is reduced in Electronic front-curtain mode, as the mechanical shutter only moves at the end of the exposure.

Silent photography off

There are options for switching the Silent photography mode on or off in the Photo Shooting menu, rather than the Custom Setting menu. When switched off, the camera uses Auto, Mechanical or Electronic front-curtain shutter, as set up in the Custom Setting menu. If you want to use a fully electronic shutter, disabling the mechanical shutter altogether, switch on Silent photography.

Silent photography on

The Silent photography mode uses a fully electronic shutter, as well as disabling flash, long exposure noise reduction, flicker reduction and the beep speaker. There’s no shutter shock but, due to the relatively slow line-by-line readout of conventional image sensors, moving subjects change their position throughout an exposure, causing lateral distortion (rolling shutter effect).

Nikon Z50 II vs Z50: 5 reasons to upgrade in 2025

Five years on, Nikon’s given its Z series baby a boost

Graphic showing the Nikon Z50 and Z50 II mirrorless cameras side-by-side

Left: Nikon Z50.Right: Nikon Z50 II

Five years is a long time in the world of cameras. So you might expect to find more novelty on the spec sheet of the Z50 II, an entry-level mirrorless model released in November 2024 – half a decade after the original Z50. Yet a quick comparison reveals that it has the same 20.9MP APS-C sensor, the same mechanical burst speeds and the same ISO range. And like the first-generation model, it also lacks in-body image stabilization.

On first impression, then, the headline numbers don’t do much to justify an upgrade from the Z50. But there’s a lot more to the Z50 II than meets the eye. Dig a little deeper, like we did in ourin-depth review, and you’ll discover that Nikon’s made a number of crucial improvements for the Z50 II.

Some of these changes make the shooting experience better, like the introduction of a vari-angle touchscreen and deeper grip. Others bolster its appeal for videographers, such as support for 10-bit N-log video. And the most significant turbocharges its performance: an Expeed 7 processor equips the Z50 II with flagship subject detection autofocus skills and 30fps electronic burst speeds.

Taken together, these add up to a much more powerful hybrid for beginners. We think the Z50 II is one of the best entry-level mirrorless cameras, at a price that represents fantastic value. There are certainly some compelling reasons to consider upgrading if you already own the Z50. Let’s explore them.

>>>EN-EL25 Battery for Nikon Z50 ZFC

1. Subject detection autofocus

Left: Nikon Z50.Right: Nikon Z50 II

Chief among the upgrades for the Z50 II is its engine: under the hood now lives Nikon’s Expeed 7 processor – the same chip found in the flagshipZ9. Despite being an entry-level model in the Z series line-up, this equips the Z50 II with some serious power. That’s especially true when it comes to autofocus.

Like the Z50, the Z50 II has a 209-point hybrid autofocus system. Thanks to that top-tier chip, though, it benefits from class-leading subject detection skills. While the original Z50 did a solid job of detecting human faces with its Eye AF, the Z50 II is on another level.

It has nine separate modes for different subjects, including people, animals and vehicles. You can also use the automatic mode to recognize and track a number of subjects in a single scene. Based on our review, it delivers the kind of speed and accuracy usually reserved for much pricier full-frame models.

In short, the Z50 II is in a different league to the Z50 when it comes to autofocus performance. If you want a camera that can keep fast-moving subjects in sharp focus, the Z50 II is worth the upgrade.

>>>EN-EL19 Battery for Nikon S6600 S3100 S6600 S7000 S2500 S2600

2. Improved handling

Left: Nikon Z50.Right: Nikon Z50 II

Both the Z50 and the Z50 II are tidily designed mirrorless cameras, with neat proportions which make them easy to travel with. In our review of the original Z50, we praised its control layout and ergonomic grip, while noting that some buttons had been omitted in order to save space.

The Nikon Z50 II is actually marginally larger than the Z50, and heavier by 70g. We think that’s an improvement: it feels reassuringly solid in the hand, yet also more comfortable to hold, thanks to a deeper grip. The refinements are minor but meaningful, making the Z50 II a more enjoyable camera to shoot with.

The same can be said of its control layout, which is closer to those of its full-frame cousins. Several functions which had to be accessed virtually on the Z50 now have dedicated buttons on the Z50 II: you’ll find a zoom button, a display button and a drive button on the back of the camera.

There’s also a new Picture Controls button on the top plate, which gives easy access to Nikon’s customizable library of color presets. More than a fad, it’s a creative addition for beginners, which can also be reprogrammed to serve as a function button. For enthusiasts who value a tactile interface with plenty of direct-access controls, the Z50 II offers more flexibility to grow.

>>>EN-EL22 Battery for Nikon 1 J4/S2

3. Powerful video specs

Left: Nikon Z50.Right: Nikon Z50 II

The Z50 was a capable entry-level stills camera that could also shoot decent4K/30p footage. That changes with the Z50 II, which boasts the recording chops of a proper hybrid. It can shoot 4K/60p video, albeit with a 1.5x crop, while uncropped 4K footage is captured at 30fps, oversampled from 5.6K.

The upgrades go beyond frame rates. The Z50 II is Nikon’s first APS-C camera to support 10-bit N-log video, including the option to use RED Luts color profiles – fruit of Nikon’s acquisition of pro cinema camera maker, RED Digital Cameras, in 2024. This unlocks a huge amount of flexibility when it comes to color grading, making the Z50 II a much more versatile tool for aspiring filmmakers.

There’s also a new Product Review mode, which makes it easy for novice influencers to create content where the focus shifts smoothly from presenter to product. Together with the move to a vari-angle touchscreen, plus the addition of a headphone port for real-time audio monitoring, the Z50 II is more powerful recording tool across the board.

If you already own the Z50 and you only shoot casual video, there’s no reason to upgrade. But if you’ve found yourself exploring videography alongside your stills photography, the Z50 II offers a whole lot more.

4. Upgraded displays

Left: The Nikon Z50’s flip screen.Right: The Nikon Z50 II’s vari-angle screen.

The sensor isn’t the only thing with the same resolution across two generations of the Z50: the rear touchscreen is still a 1.04m-dot display, while theOLEDviewfinder remains a 0.39-inch, 2.36m-dot number. But those figures tell only half the story.

The EVF on the Z50 II is twice as bright, with up to 1000 nits peak brightness. In practise, that means your eyes have to do less work when adjusting from bright ambient conditions to the display inside the viewfinder. A small but noticeable improvement.

More significant are the changes to the rear display. It’s slightly bigger than the panel on the Z50 (3.2 inches plays 3 inches) and the interface helpfully rotates when you’re shooting in portrait orientation. Crucially, Nikon has also ditched the flip-down design of the Z50’s display in favor of a fully articulating setup.

Where the tilting screen of the original would be obstructed by a tripod, the vari-angle display of the Z50 II offers full flexibility for framing from the front, side and even underneath. If you regularly shoot on the move or record video with your camera mounted to a tripod, this change will make a significant difference.

5. Faster shooting

Left: Nikon Z50.Right: Nikon Z50 II

Burst speeds won’t be a dealbreaker for every photographer, but if action is one of the genres you like to cover, the Z50 II easily wins that race. Burst speeds with the mechanical shutter max out at the same rate as the Z50: 11fps. But thanks to that Expeed 7 processor, it has a secret weapon.

A new High-Speed Frame Capture+ mode allows the Z50 II to shoot stills at up to 30fps with the electronic shutter. In our tests, we did encounter some rolling shutter in this mode. Nevertheless, it leaves the Z50 in the dust when it comes to firing off continuous bursts.

The Z50 II is faster in other ways, too. Where the Z50’s performance is fettered by its UHS-I SD card slot, the Z50 II benefits from support for UHS-II cards, meaning faster read and write speeds. Its wired interface has also been upgraded from micro USB to USB-C, which means 5Gbit/s transfer rates.

Taken altogether, these enhancements make the Z50 II an altogether speedier camera to shoot and work with. The Z50 was no slouch, but if you’ll regularly push it to its limits, the Z50 II is the faster horse.

Closing thought: Do you need II?

If you’re choosing between the Z50 and the Z50 II, the answer is clear: the latter is more powerful, more enjoyable to shoot with and more versatile for recording video. It’s a fantastic entry-level mirrorless hybrid for beginners and one that represents excellent value.

The argument for upgrading is less black and white if you already own a Z50. Whether the improvements warrant a switch will depend on what and how you like to shoot. If you’re mainly into landscapes, for example, there’s not really a compelling reason to upgrade. The Z50 II handles noise slightly better, but it fundamentally captures stills with the same sensor.

On the other hand, if you’re into action or wildlife photography, the enhancements delivered by the Expeed 7 processor are significant. Subject detection autofocus is right up there with the top models in Nikon’s Z series range, making the Z50 II a genuinely capable choice for tracking and shooting fast-moving subjects.

Equally, if you feel held back by the video capabilities of the Z50, the Z50 II has the specs to satisfy a keen learner. It’s every bit a genuine hybrid, with a range of features for filmmaking. Whether you want to monitor audio in real time or try your hand at color grading, the Z50 II will let you do it.

Other refinements, such as new buttons and a vari-angle touchscreen, don’t justify an upgrade on their own. But taken as a package of improvements, the Z50 II is every bit the better camera. If you like what the Z50 offers but want something that’s faster and more versatile, there’s a strong case for switching.

Nikon Z50 II review: Perfect for Travel and Everyday Shooting

Nikon’s entry-level mirrorless camera gets a performance upgrade


Verdict
Pitched as an entry-level mirrorless camera for new enthusiasts, the Nikon Z50 II has a secret weapon: an Expeed 7 processor gives it flagship performance, with subject recognition autofocus that’s up there with the best. Tidy dimensions and good ergonomics make it an easy camera to travel and shoot with, while improved video specs bolster its credentials as an all-rounder. There’s still no in-body image stabilization and the 20.9MP resolution is bettered by other APS-C rivals. But with its competitive price tag, the Nikon Z50 II is an excellent value camera to learn and grow with.

Pros

  • +Expeed 7 chip gives rapid performance
  • +Top-spec subject detection autofocus
  • +Deeper grip and vari-angle touchscreen
  • +Improved video specs including 4K/60p

Cons

  • -No in-body image stabilization
  • -20.9MP resolution is average
  • -Not a huge upgrade from the Z50

Nikon Z50 II: two-minute review

A tidily packaged APS-C camera with great handling and plenty of features at decent price, we rated the originalNikon Z50highly. Its successor takes that recipe and supercharges it, with the help of an Expeed 7 processor. The result is a versatile mirrorless camera that’s perfect to learn and grow with.

Its dimensions are neat enough to compete with thebest travel cameras, yet Nikon hasn’t sacrificed ergonomics. Slightly larger than the original, the Z50 II feels fantastic in the hand. With a deep grip and plenty of direct-access controls, as well as a useful vari-angle touchscreen and upgraded viewfinder, it’s a satisfying camera to shoot with, whether you’re capturing stills or video.

>>>EN-EL25 Battery for Nikon Z50 ZFC

Under the hood, Nikon’s latest Expeed 7 processor runs the show – the same silicon found in theNikon Z9andZ8. It might be pitched as an entry-level option, but that chip gives the Z50 II some serious pace. The interface is quick as you like, while autofocus performance is superlative. Equipped with detection modes for nine different subject types, including people, animals and vehicles, it’s as fast and accurate as many of Nikon’s more expensive models.

>>>EN-EL18D Battery for Nikon Z9 D4 D4S D5 D6

Processor aside, a lot remains unchanged from the Z50. That includes the APS-C sensor which, at 20.9MP, is bettered by many of the best beginner mirrorless cameras. That said, it’s still capable of producing detailed and realistic images when paired with a quality Z mount lens. If you already own a Z50, you won’t notice a huge difference in overall quality – although noise performance has been improved thanks to the Expeed 7 processor, meaning stills are cleaner at the same ISO settings.

Nikon has also bolstered the video capabilities of the Z50 II, boosting its status as an all-rounder.4Kframe rates now top out at 60fps, albeit with a 1.5x crop, and it becomes the first Nikon APS-C camera to support 10-bit N-log video – giving videography enthusiasts more flexibility when color grading in post. A headphone socket is a welcome addition, too.

The features above are complemented by a new Product Review mode, which allows influencers to produce content where the focus shifts seamlessly from presenter to product. There’s also a Picture Control button on the top plate, which gives easy access to color presets, with the option to add downloaded Creator Recipes alongside the built-in presets.

Taken as a whole, the Z50 II proves that one camera can work effectively for different creative styles and experience levels. Buy it as a beginner and it will quickly yield impressive results. Stick with it as you improve and the Z50 II has the controls and capabilities to continue delivering.

Nikon Z50 II: specs

Sensor:APS-C, 20.9MP
Video:4K 30p / 4K 60p
Cont. shooting11fps (mechanical) / 30fps (electronic)
Viewfinder:2.36m-dot EVF
LCD:3.2-inch vari-angle touchscreen 1.04m-dots
Battery:EN-EL25a
Weight:550g (with battery and card)
Dimensions:27 × 96.8 × 66.5mm

>>>EN-EL15C Battery for Nikon D500 D610 D7200 D7500 D780

Nikon Z50 II: design and handling

  • Upgraded viewfinder and vari-angle touchscreen
  • Slightly bigger dimensions with a deeper grip
  • Dedicated Picture Controls button for style presets

At first glance, the Nikon Z50 II bears a strong resemblance to the original Z50. It’s a tidily packaged camera, very much in the established mold of entry-level mirrorless models. Its dimensions are compact enough to be travel friendly, yet it also benefits from a sturdy build and comfortable ergonomics.

That’s in part because the Z50 II is marginally bigger and heavier than the first version. In the hand, we found its grip substantial enough to wrap our fingers around, without being cumbersome. We also appreciated the extra grams: the body features plenty of plastic, but doesn’t feel flimsy in use.

Look closer at the Z50 II and you’ll find several welcome refinements. The tilting screen of the original has become a fully articulating display, a much more flexible solution for framing on the move. This is especially useful for videography and vlogging, as it can flip all the way around to face the front. So is the addition of a headphone port, which allows aspiring filmmakers to monitor audio in real time when recording footage.

The viewfinder has also received the attention of Nikon’s product developers. It has the same 2.36m-dot resolution as before, but is now twice as bright at up to 1000 nits. In practise, that makes the EVF an easier adjustment for the eyes when framing and shooting in daylight conditions.

Eagle eyes will also discover new additions to the control layout. In our review of the Z50, we complimented the layout and balance of its buttons and dials, praising its resemblance to full-frame Nikon siblings like theZ6andZ7. The Z50 II gets closer still, with the addition of five new buttons.

You still don’t get a joystick, which means selecting the AF point requires use of the touchscreen. What you do get are zoom buttons, a display button and a dedicated drive button. These aren’t game-changing additions, but we valued their presence: they bolster the Z50 II’s chops for aspiring enthusiasts, making it easier to change key settings, without cluttering the interface.

The fifth new button sits on the top plate. A first for any Nikon camera, it gives instant access to Picture Controls – a library of aesthetic presets. To seasoned users, this might sound like a fad, but we think it will appeal to learners who want to get creative while shooting JPEGs. 31 profiles come pre-installed, with the option to adjust them through NX Studio. You can also download Creator Recipes from Nikon Imaging Cloud, and select which appear in the list.

The button’s presence leans into the Z50 II’s status as a camera for all kinds of creators. So does the fact that you can re-program its function, a useful option which will appeal to users as they move into shooting RAW stills and making color edits in post.

  • Design score: 4.5/5

Nikon Z50 II: features and performance

  • Expeed 7 processor drives subject-recognition AF
  • Same 20.9MP APS-C sensor as the Nikon Z50
  • First Nikon APS-C camera with 10-bit N-log video

If you already own a Nikon Z50, you’ll find a lot of familiar numbers on the spec sheet. The Z50 II uses the same 20.9MP APS-C sensor as its predecessor. Its mechanical burst speeds max out at 11fps. And, like many of the best mirrorless cameras for beginners, it still doesn’t offer in-body image stabilization. What it does have is a new engine.

The headline upgrade for the Z50 II is its Expeed 7 processor – the same chip used by the flagship Nikon Z9 and, subsequently, the Z8. This is the first time it’s been fitted to an APS-C body. As the motor that drives everything from autofocus to burst shooting speeds to video frame rates, it has a lot to do. Based on our experience, the Expeed 7 makes the Z50 II a proper pocket rocket.

Chief among the benefits of that new chip is top-spec subject-recognition autofocus. It might be an entry-level model, but the Nikon Z50 II can detect and lock on to targets rapidly and reliably. It has dedicated detection modes for nine different subject types, including people, animals, birds and cars, as well as an auto setting which can pick up a range of subjects at the same time.

In our experience, the Z50 II’s autofocus performance feels just as snappy in action scenarios as many of Nikon’s more expensive full-frame Z series models. With a new High-Speed Frame Capture+ mode which allows you to shoot at up to 30fps using the electronic shutter, this is a camera that’s perfectly comfortable covering action. We did encounter some rolling shutter when using this mode, but it’s nevertheless an impressive feature for an entry-level camera.

It helps that the SD card slot now supports UHS-II cards for faster read and write speeds. The USB port has also been upgraded to a Type-C number, which brings a host of benefits: as well as 5Gbit/s transfer rates, it can be used to charge the camera directly, while UVC/UAC compatibility means it can be used as a webcam without the need for additional software.

Nikon has pitched the Z50 II as a hybrid, which is reflected in its video skills. Even with the same sensor as the Z50, Nikon has harnessed the power of the Expeed 7 to squeeze more recording performance out of it. That includes the ability to capture 4K/60p video, albeit with a 1.5x crop. Uncroppped 4K footage is shot at 30fps, oversampled from 5.6K.

It’s also the first Nikon APS-C camera to support 10-bit N-log video, as well as the option to use RED Luts. This makes the Z50 II a camera with the flexibility for budding filmmakers to grow with, as they learn the ropes of videography and start to explore the possibilities of color grading.

These enthusiast-grade video capabilities might go beyond what most beginners need, but the Z50 II is also well-equipped for first-timers. A new Product Review mode seamlessly adjusts focus from the presenter to an object brought into the frame, similar to the Product Showcase feature found on cameras like theSony ZV-1. It won’t be relevant to everyone, but if you have ambitions of becoming an influencer, it’s an effective tool.

Like the Z50, the Z50 II features electronic vibration reduction to help steady handheld footage. As before, this applies a 1.3x crop to video. Nikon claims that the feature has been improved for the Z50 II, though our tests found that it still isn’t a replacement for full in-body image stabilization.

  • Features and performance score: 4.5/5

Nikon Z50 II: image and video quality

  • Excellent image quality in most conditions
  • Better noise-handling than the Z50 at the same ISO
  • 4K/60p video with a 1.5x crop

On the whole, images from the Z50 II are as they were with the Z50: realistic, vibrant and clear. While its competitors offer higher resolutions, the 20.9MP sensor inside the Z50 II still does an admirable job of capturing detail.

With the white balance on automatic, we found stills out of the camera to be nicely saturated and just the right amount of dynamic range, without straying too far from neutral. The metering system coped well in a range of lighting scenarios, delivering well-judged exposures. We found that skin tones in particular were rendered faithfully in natural lighting, with a touch of warmth only detectable when shooting under heavy artificial lighting.

While its sensor size and ISO range are unchanged, we found that the Nikon Z50 II handles noise better than the Z50, thanks to the Expeed 7 processor. It was always going to lose out to its full-frame siblings, but you can get away with pushing the ISO number higher on the Z50 II before significant smoothing becomes an issue. ISO 12800 is still the upper limit, but you can comfortably lean on ISO 6400 if the conditions demand it.

If you’re purely a stills photographer, you will get better resolution elsewhere. What sets the Z50 II apart as a value offering is its autofocus performance, as well as its hybrid video abilities. As noted above, stabilization isn’t perfect, but the same adjectives are true of 4K footage from the Z50 II as for its stills.

We found 4K/60p video to be well-defined and nicely balanced. In our tests, the Z50 II adapted well to different light sources and levels, producing lifelike footage that’s good for grading. Used with a tripod, we can’t see content creators having any issues with the video that the Nikon Z50 II captures.

  • Image and video quality score: 4.5/5

Should I buy the Nikon Z50 II?

Buy it if…

You want top-spec autofocus
Driven by Nikon’s Expeed 7 processor, the Z50 II offers autofocus performance to rival the flagship Z9. With subject detection modes for people, animals and more, it’s rapid and reliable.

You value ergonomics and handling
A deeper grip makes the Z50 II even more comfortable to shoot with. A vari-angle touchscreen is helpful for framing, while new buttons bring its control layout in line with full-frame Z models.

You want to shoot a mix of stills and video
With 4K/30p footage oversampled from 5.6K, plus support for N-log 10-bit recording and a useful Product Review mode for vloggers, the Z50 II has the video capabilities of a proper hybrid.

Don’t buy it if…

You already own the Z50
Performance improvements from the Expeed 7 processor are notable, but with few other changes to the overall package, there’s probably not enough here to justify upgrading from the original Z50.

You need in-body image stabilization
Like many entry-level mirrorless cameras, the Z50 II lacks in-body image stabilization. Electronic video stabilization is available with a crop, but you’ll need a VR lens for optical shake reduction.

You want high-resolution stills
At 20.9MP, the Z50 II’s APS-C sensor doesn’t have the highest pixel count. If the number of megapixels matters to you, other entry-level mirrorless cameras offer more for similar money.